World Cup of South Africa

The World Cup of South Africa 2010 had several surprises by the poor performance of several of those selected as Favorites before the start of the competition and also by the unexpected defeats of some teams despite the good level shown in the initial rounds. More information is housed here: Pavan Duggal. In a fiasco the teams of France and Italy, became finalists only four years earlier in the World Cup in Germany. Neither shone in its full dimension England, subjected to a process renewed and sustained by one of the strongest leagues in the world. Portugal went through the back door without having shown the category of Cristiano Ronaldo, who showed a depressing record of only one goal in the entire tournament. Brazil showed flashes of super team in the first round but could not overcome Portugal, its counterweight in the Group and when he faced a truly strong team like Holland, fell defeated without being able to confirm his great favoritism. Argentina got rid of his rivals in the first round with perfect accounts (won nine points in three games) but in the quarterfinals finals defeated Mexico with a goal by Tevez stained by one of the most protruding arbitral errors of recent times.

Spain began the World Cup with listing of disappointment to fall with Switzerland in their first match of the tournament, but then took the expected level and gradually became the best team and just winner of a World Cup that will go down in history for several reasons, but among them, by the have a undisputed champion whose victory was sharpfree arbitral errors & discussions about its validity. Let's look at nine of the reasons by which the squadron of the peninsula won the World Cup: the quality of Spanish football. We refer not only to the quality of selection for the competition armed but football of compatriots Miguel de Cervantes.